- to find out where there are gaps in accessibility requirements;
- to ascertain in what areas future (funded) work is required;
- to discover in what projects the community should be involved;
- a chance for the community to say what they felt TechDis and the SIG should be doing;
- to discuss whether areas such as UID (Universal Instructional Design), inclusion, and/or personalisation should be part of TechDis' and/or the SIG's remit;
- to understand why the IMS Accessibility Specifications (now ISO Standards) aren't being implemented;
- to address support issues surrounding Brian Kelly and Lawrie Phipp's paper on Holistic Accessibility (what practical steps could be taken to implement this approach).
The outputs of the three main discussion themes can be found via the links below:
Discussion Session 1: Funding and Future Work - Presentation, Discussion Questions and Feedback
Discussion Session 2: TechDis' and the Accessibility SIG's Remit - Presentation, Discussion Questions and Feedback
Discussion Session 3: Specifications, Standards and the Holistic Approach - Presentation, Discussion Questions and Feedback
No comments:
Post a Comment